Monarez's Firing is Step #8 in the "Aluminum Plan"

By Alex Morozov

August 27, 2025

Here is a simple explanation for Susan Monarez's firing.

Recall, we and others are predicting that Kennedy will shortly announce the results of an HHS-sponsored study showing that aluminum-containing vaccines cause autism. This study will likely be fraudulent, but we won't necessarily be able to prove that it is.

Kennedy then will pass this data to the newly restaffed and loyal ACIP to vote. And judging by their rehearsal in their first meeting, they will vote to recommend to take all aluminum-containing vaccines off the schedule. By law, this recommendation then goes to the director of the CDC for endorsement.

Kennedy initially nominated Weldon to CDC director, the mercury-causes-autism guy and a mentee of Dan Burton, the original anti-vaxxer in Congress (more on that in a future story - let's just say Andrew Wakefield was his star witness).

But several republicans woke up and opposed Weldon's candidacy - Cassidy, Collins and Mirkowsky. We all wish they had done that for Kennedy - that would have made a difference. Opposing Weldon accomplished nothing, as you will see in a second.

When that fell through, Kennedy (1) moved the autism study to NIH, and (2) was forced by the Senate to appoint a well-credentialed scientist, Susan Menarez.

But she was clearly in the way because the ACIP recommendation would go to her. So before he unveils the “aluminum causes autism” news, he needed Monarez to be out.

With this firing, Kennedy and Trump are essentially telling the Senate - you can vote for whoever you want, and then if they get in the way, we just fire them.

What is such an important thing that they are planning, that would risk them blowing up the CDC?

The "aluminum plan."

By putting together multiple lines of circumstantial evidence, we have uncovered what we are calling The Kennedy-Siri-Bigtree Plan to Defraud America - proclaiming in September that “Aluminum Causes Autism.”

The crux of the plan was articulated by Kennedy in 2021 when he stated, “Under the Vaccine Injury Act, you cannot sue a vaccine company for an injury... The only exception is that if they knew of an injury that is caused by a vaccine and they failed to list it on their manufacturer’s insert.”

He was referring to the US National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 which shields vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, and instead sets up a program called Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). It was a win for patients who now had a much easier process to receive compensation, and for pharma who were on the brink of stopping vaccine development.

But for one group this law was a devastating loss: antivax lawyers. Typically medical malpractice lawyers charge a 25-40% “contingency fee,” meaning that they do the lawsuit for free but take a cut from the ultimate award to the patient. But in VICP cases, contingency payments are prohibited.

However, there is one loophole that permits VICP to be skipped. Section 42 U.S.C. § 300aa–22(b) of the Act provides an exception if “the injury or death resulted from a vaccine not properly prepared or was caused by the manufacturer’s failure to provide proper warnings or instructions.”

Since Kennedy first mentioned aluminum in 2005, in his Deadly Immunity article, the question remained: how can aluminum in vaccines be toxic, if it's ubiquitous in our environment?

The first clue came when Meryl Nass, (an MIT graduate and Maine former doctor whose license was suspended during COVID) was researching the Gulf War Syndrome in the early 2000s. She zeroed in on the anthrax vaccine (which contains aluminum) as the cause. To find further evidence, she needed a neurotoxicologist, and found one in none other than... Christopher Shaw (See Aluminum Grand Finale). The question was, can we reproduce Gulf War Syndrome by injecting the anthrax vaccine into mice? But they could not procure the actual vaccine, Shaw recalls in his book (with Foreward by Kennedy). So he just injected aluminum. Mice developed neurotoxicity (note, to this day, all papers showing neurotoxicity of aluminum in mice have Shaw as an author).

This caught the attention of Leslie Manookian, who in collaboration with Claire Dwoskin was producing an anti-vaxx documentary, The Greater Good. Manookian interviewed Shaw, who is in the film describing his experiments, voicing over a cartoon of a dying mouse (The film premiered in April 2011). Manookian then introduced Shaw to Claire Dwoskin, and the aluminum plan was set in motion.

The plan is as follows.

1.    (Done) In 2011, anti-vaxxers – Andrew Wakefield, Barbara Loe Fisher, Claire Dwoskin, etc, start to collaborate with the “aluminum family” of international researchers - Christopher A. Shaw, Lucija Tomljenovic, Guillemette Crepeaux, Romain K. Gherardi, Christopher Exley, Lluís Luján, etc (See Aluminum Grand Finale part 1)

2.    (Done) Anti-vaxxers - primarily Dwoskin, an aluminum-focused anti-vaxx philanthropist - sponsor research by the “aluminum family” demonstrating harm of aluminum vaccines. This research results in dozens of scientific publications supporting the harms of aluminum, that remain unchallenged and un-retracted. No systematic effort by the mainstream scientific community has yet been undertaken to evaluate the claims made by the supported “aluminum family.”

3.    (Done) Discuss with Trump. When Kennedy met with Trump in January 2017, they likely discussed aluminum. But their plan would have to wait until HHS leadership would be replaced with loyalists.

4.    (Done) File petitions with the HHS, in 2017 and 2021, to warn of aluminum risks, to document that they were warned. The “aluminum family” above is cited in the petitions.

5.    (Done) Proclaim that there is an “epidemic of autism” starting at the “red line” year of 1989. (HiB and HBV vaccines, both aluminum-containing, were introduced in the 1980s). Kennedy said "EPA scientists" came up with this "red line" of 1989. If you are wondering what he is talking about, here is Wakefield discussing the paper in the 2011 Jamaica meeting.